← DRENDA research portal
Recorded internal experiment · 7 September 2026

D0 → D1 → D2

Did a previously acquired capability causally enable acquisition of another under the same evidence budget?

Availability: internal case summary, not an independently reproducible public package. The hashes below identify reported artifacts; the corresponding private files are not downloads. The public continuity test and its signed proofs do not rerun this succession experiment.

Comparison

D0 vs D1

Both received 62 observations and the same budget. The record reports no executable second candidate from D0; D1 selected a previously validated artifact to construct an intermediate feature and synthesize D2.

Ablation

Remove and restore

Removing D1 made D2 unusable; restoring D1 recovered it. Removing D2 removed its measured gain; exact restore recovered it. The candidate references D1 by hash.

Retention

Restart and transfer

The internal record reports 64/64 post-freeze holdout cases, a real Resident process restart, four longer-sequence transfer cases and a repeated parent ablation after restart.

Frozen identities

CampaignCUMULATIVE-3926197fd1f6
D1 artifact SHA-256fe5026386f6244de2701f1809f4ea66d5812d738c33f904390d7881bff6143e3
D2 artifact SHA-2561d57ed77990fab34fa0f505444d2856c4f3e332697f17e285694d2244ebc79b4
Bundle IDbf017875c79d369cddbe4b7699e9431978c063f6da84b3c6ceb536a3a5109112
EvaluatorInternal adversarial reviewer in the recorded experiment; no independent external replication is claimed, and no criterion relaxation was recorded.
Origin of candidateThe recorded lineage attributes D1 selection and D2 synthesis to DRENDA/Ω; the generic succession bridge and assessment infrastructure were externally engineered.

Evidence trail

The internal freeze protocol, pre-restart result and final result were hashed as separate files. Their SHA-256 digests are listed below so a supervised evaluator can compare them with the original records:

FROZEN_PROTOCOL.jsone2d03ad40c73521f43c6af2c24f17fe78c297dec8d84449a0882a226310a13f8
PRE_RESTART_RESULT.json283c57d725dd07582bfb6913f37ebf556479576c5192ad16f767f0837bd8882d
FINAL_RESULT.json7e6200153d2dffb92f957a1743943045695310f9b4d4176a9db667094f6c1116

The published summary is not a substitute for access to the frozen implementation, raw inputs and independent repetition. The 64-case holdout remains private. An independent reviewer can request a supervised replay with a newly chosen post-freeze task, identical budgets, ablation, restore and restart; the outcome should be reported whether positive or negative.

What a new independent trial requires

Download the preregistration and reproduction protocol. It specifies a new evaluator-controlled task family and concealed holdout after the freeze, D0/D1 equal-budget comparisons, D1/D2 ablation and exact restore, fresh-process restart, transfer, provenance and failure reporting.

The protocol is a plan, not a claimed run. A sanitized executable package, permitted initial state, artifact bytes, independent Judge rules and evaluator-controlled execution environment must first be provided under an explicit agreement. Publishing those currently private materials requires a separate review and authorization; it must not expose the Resident, memory, credentials or original hidden test answers.

Existing public proof downloads · Capabilities versus available tests

Run the public continuity challengeRequest independent replay